Skip to Content
Report an accessibility problem

Long-term monitoring of atmospheric deposition in central Arizona-Phoenix, ongoing since 1999

Publication date: 2016-11-17

Author(s):

  • Nancy Grimm, Arizona State University
  • Stevan Earl, Julie Ann Wrigley Global Institute of Sustainability, CAPLTER
  • James Anderson, Ira A. Fulton School of Engineering, Arizona State University
  • H Fernando, Arizona State University
  • Susanne Grossman-Clarke, ASU Global Institute of Sustainability
  • William Stefanov, Arizona State University
  • Diane Hope, Arizona State University
  • Joseph Zehnder, Arizona State University
  • Peter Hyde

Abstract:

The aims of this study are to examine the magnitude and spatial variability in the concentration and flux of wet deposited NO3-N, NH4-N, DOC, PO4-P, Cl, SO4, H+, Ca, Mg, Na, K across the Central Arizona-Phoenix region, including the developed urban core and outlying desert. Also to examine patterns of coarse dry particulate deposition across the study area and provide some minimum estimates on levels of dry deposition of these ions. Particularly, this study was designed to answer the question: 'To what extent are concentrations and fluxes of these ions enhanced at sites within the urban core relative to undeveloped desert sites upwind and downwind of the city'.

At the outset, the project included eight wet-dry collectors located to form a transect running approximately W-E across the study area from outlying desert to the west, upwind of the prevailing synoptic wind direction, through agriculture to urban core sites, to two downwind sites in the desert to the east and northeast. Collectors were co-located at sites of Maricopa County or Arizona Department of Environmental Quality monitoring stations wherever possible. Monitoring at most sampling locations ran from 1999 through the mid-2000s when sampling was discontinued at several sites. Sampling continued at the Lost Dutchman State Park, also a Desert Fertilization experiment site with a focus on atmospheric deposition, through 2016. Sampling continues at a site on the Arizona State University Tempe campus that was added to the program in 2009.


Keywords:

Biogeochemical Patterns, Processes, and Human Outcomes, movement of organic matter, movement of inorganic matter sonoran desert, phoenix, urban, metropolitan area, gis, nitrate, inorganic nutrients, Biogeochemical Patterns, Processes, and Human Outcomes, caplter core monitoring, nutrient, core monitoring, precipitation, atmosphere, nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, deposition, anion, cation, phosphate, ammonia, magnesium, sodium, calcium, dry deposition, wet deposition, no, Nitrogen deposition, no dry deposition flux, no2, no2 dry deposition flux, hno3, HNO3 dry deposition flux, Total N dry deposition flux urban, water, deserts, nitrate, air quality, monitoring, insects, land cover, vegetation, atmosphere, deposition, wet deposition, birds, dissolved organic carbon, rain, methods, events, modeling, fluxes, cores, global positioning system, simulation, nitrite, nitric acid caplter, central arizona phoenix longterm ecological research, arizona, caplter created, az, cap, arid land

Temporal Coverage:

1999-05-20 to 2016-08-16

Geographic Coverage:

Geographic Description: Phoenix metropolitan area in Arizona, USA
Bounding Coordinates:
Longitude:-112.839492 to -111.470845
Latitude:33.726193 to 31.948995

Contact:

Information Manager, Arizona State University, 
Julie Ann Wrigley Global Institute of Sustainability,POB 875402,TEMPE
 caplter.data@asu.edu

Methods used in producing this dataset: Show


Data Files (7) :

Tabular: 23_adpSites_9ae243b0de31915a635ae775c7503012.csv

Description: description, general location, and other details regarding wet-dry bucket deposition monitoring locations

Column Description Type Units
site_name name of site
string
lat latitude of site in decimal degrees
float degree
long longitude of site in decimal degrees
float degree
date date established
date Format: YYYY-MM-DD
otherAirMonit other air monitoring equipment on site
string
location location description
string
groundCover description of ground cover
string
heightAboveGround height above ground of bucket collector
string
vegetation description of vegetation
string
obstructions descriptions of any obstructions
string
road road type and conditions
string
notes additional observations
string

Tabular: 23_samplesResults_130d6abed138f073fa48df1f3d991667.csv

Description: sample collection date, site, notes and other details, and corresponding results of chemical analyses of storm water collected in wet buckets, and dry-bucket rinsate

Column Description Type Units
site_id three-letter identifier of sampling location
string
Enumeration:
  • SYC: Sycamore Creek
  • SSL: Sunny Slopes
  • DFF: Duncan Family Farms
  • LDS: Lost Dutchman State Park
  • PSS: Phoenix Supersite
  • BRD: Brooks Road
  • PVN: Palo Verde Nuclear Powerplant
  • CTP: Chandler Water Treatment Plant
  • ORG: Organ Pipe National Park
  • PRE: ASU Presidents House
  • PVR: Palo Verde Redhawk (moved a few m from PVN)
  • LSA: ASU Life Science A wing roof
coll_date sample collection date
date Format: YYYY-MM-DD
coll_time sample collection time
date Format: hh:mm:ss
comments observations regarding sample collection or processing
string
gross_wt gross weight of bucket and sample
float kilogram
net_samp_wt net sample weight
float gram
type type of collection
string
Enumeration:
  • wet: wet bucket collection
  • dry: dry bucket collection
  • bulk: bulk deposition collection (wet + dry)
  • blank: sample blank
precipitation amount of precipitation at the time of collection
float millimeter
bucket_wt bucket weight
float kilogram
lid_wt bucket lid weight
float kilogram
rinse_vol volume of rinsing fluid used
float kilogram
fecal contamination by bird droppings
string
Enumeration:
  • 0: false
  • 1: true
insects contamination by dead insects
string
Enumeration:
  • 0: false
  • 1: true
disturbance signs of disturbance
string
Enumeration:
  • 0: false
  • 1: true
lid_particles contamination by the lid
string
Enumeration:
  • 0: false
  • 1: true
analysis chemical analysis
string
Enumeration:
  • CaD_FLAME_AA: Dissolved Calcium (FLAME_AA)
  • CaD_ICP: Dissolved Calcium (ICP)
  • CaD_ICPMS: Dissolved Calcium (ICPMS)
  • ClD_LACHAT: Dissolved Chloride (LACHAT)
  • DOC final: DOC final
  • DOC_TOC: Dissolved organic carbon
  • KD_FLAME_AA: Dissolved potassium (FLAME_AA)
  • KD_ICP: Dissolved Potassium (ICP)
  • KD_ICPMS: Dissolved Potassium (ICPMS)
  • MgD_FLAME_AA: Dissolved Magnesium (FLAME_AA)
  • MgD_ICP: Dissolved Magnesium (ICP)
  • MgD_ICPMS: Dissolved Magnesium (ICPMS)
  • MoD_ICPMS: Dissolved Molybdenum (ICPMS)
  • NaD_FLAME_AA: Dissolved sodium (FLAME_AA)
  • NaD_ICP: Dissolved Sodium (ICP)
  • NaD_ICPMS: Dissolved Sodium (ICPMS)
  • NH4_LACHAT: Ammonium (LACHAT)
  • NH4_TRAACS: Ammonium (TRAACS)
  • NO3D_LACHAT: Dissolved Nitrate (LACHAT)
  • NO3D_TRAACS: Dissolved Nitrate (TRAACS)
  • NO3T_LACHAT: Total Nitrogen (LACHAT)
  • NO3T_TOC_TN: Total Nitrogen by combustion analysis TOC/TN
  • PO4D_LACHAT: Dissolved phosphorus (LACHAT)
  • PO4D_TRAACS: Dissolved phosphorus (TRAACS)
  • PO4T_LACHAT: Total phosphorus (LACHAT)
  • SO4D_IC: Dissolved sulfate (IC)
  • SO4_LACHAT: Dissolved Sulphate (LACHAT)
date_analyzed analysis date
date Format: YYYY-MM-DD
final_value analysis result
float milligramsPerLiter
data_qualifier analysis qualifier
string
Enumeration:
  • J: The Identification of the analyte is acceptable, but quality assurance criteria indicate that the quantitative values may be outside the normal expected range of precision ,i.e., the quantitative value is considered estimated.
  • L: lost
  • M: missing
  • N: There is an indication that the reported analyte is present, however, all quality control requirements necessary for confirmation were not met. The analyte is tentatively identified.
  • NA: no analysis. Not enoughsample to analyze everything. This element was omitted.
  • Q: The reported results fall between the Method Detection Limits (MDL) and the Method Quantitation Limits (MQL) with qualification for quantitation.
  • R: Data is considered to be rejected and shall not be used. Quality control criteria failed such that it can not be determined if the analyte is present or absent. Resampling and analysis are necessary to confirm or deny the presence of the analyte.
  • SS: data may still appear somewhere. Still searched for.
  • X: The reported value falls below the Method Detection Limits (MDL). The MDL value was entered in place of the reported value.

Spatial Vector: 23_ADPsamplingLocations

Description: Geospatial file with site information
Horizontal Coordinate System:WGS_1984_UTM_Zone_12N
Geometry Type: Point

Column Description Type Units
FID Internal feature number.
OID
Shape Feature geometry.
Geometry
CORR_TYPE GPS correction type
string
RCVR_TYPE GPS receiver type
string
GPS_DATE GPS_DATE
Date Format: MM/DD/YYYY
GPS_TIME GPS_TIME
string Format: HH:MM:SS AP
HORZ_PREC GPS Horizontal Precisions
double meter
VERT_PREC GPS vertical precision
double meter
SITE_ID SITE_ID
string

Raster: Atmospheric Deposition NO Dry Deposition Fluxes in 1998

Description: The role of urban vegetation on NOx-derived dry deposition fluxes was investigated for the arid Phoenix (Arizona, USA) metropolitan area using the Community Multiscale Air Quality Model (CMAQ) (9-13 June 1998). A new land cover classification and updated land cover data were introduced in the model to account for spatial extent and heterogeneity of urban land cover. Adjustments were made in the deposition velocity calculations to consider the adaptation of local plants to the environmental conditions of Central Arizona. According to the simulations 25 % of the NOx derived dry deposition fluxes in the urban area were deposited on vegetation. When urban vegetation was excluded from the simulations NO2 deposition was reduced by 57 % because of the significantly lower deposition velocities of impervious compared to vegetated surfaces; nitric acid deposition was relatively unchanged. Using a diagnostic model with input data from urban air quality monitoring sites, hourly NO and NO2 dry N deposition fluxes were simulated for the entire year 1998 to ~6 kg ha-1 yr-1. Dry deposition declined during the summer months, due to lower pollutant concentrations and temperature-induced closure of the plant stomata during afternoon hours.
Temporal Coverage: 1998-10-06
Horizontal Coordinate System:WGS_1984_UTM_Zone_12N
Rows:43
Columns:62

Column Description Type Units
Value Total NO (kgN / ha / year)
Integer kilogramsPerHectarePerYear

Raster: Atmospheric Deposition NO2 Dry Deposition Fluxes in 1998

Description: The role of urban vegetation on NOx-derived dry deposition fluxes was investigated for the arid Phoenix (Arizona, USA) metropolitan area using the Community Multiscale Air Quality Model (CMAQ) (9-13 June 1998). A new land cover classification and updated land cover data were introduced in the model to account for spatial extent and heterogeneity of urban land cover. Adjustments were made in the deposition velocity calculations to consider the adaptation of local plants to the environmental conditions of Central Arizona. According to the simulations 25 % of the NOx derived dry deposition fluxes in the urban area were deposited on vegetation. When urban vegetation was excluded from the simulations NO2 deposition was reduced by 57 % because of the significantly lower deposition velocities of impervious compared to vegetated surfaces; nitric acid deposition was relatively unchanged. Using a diagnostic model with input data from urban air quality monitoring sites, hourly NO and NO2 dry N deposition fluxes were simulated for the entire year 1998 to ~6 kg ha-1 yr-1. Dry deposition declined during the summer months, due to lower pollutant concentrations and temperature-induced closure of the plant stomata during afternoon hours.
Horizontal Coordinate System:WGS_1984_UTM_Zone_12N
Rows:43
Columns:62

Column Description Type Units
Value Total NO2 (kgN / ha / year)
Integer kilogramsPerHectarePerYear

Raster: Atmospheric Deposition HNO3 Dry Deposition Fluxes in 1998

Description: The role of urban vegetation on NOx-derived dry deposition fluxes was investigated for the arid Phoenix (Arizona, USA) metropolitan area using the Community Multiscale Air Quality Model (CMAQ) (9-13 June 1998). A new land cover classification and updated land cover data were introduced in the model to account for spatial extent and heterogeneity of urban land cover. Adjustments were made in the deposition velocity calculations to consider the adaptation of local plants to the environmental conditions of Central Arizona. According to the simulations 25 percent of the NOx derived dry deposition fluxes in the urban area were deposited on vegetation. When urban vegetation was excluded from the simulations NO2 deposition was reduced by 57 percent because of the significantly lower deposition velocities of impervious compared to vegetated surfaces; nitric acid deposition was relatively unchanged. Using a diagnostic model with input data from urban air quality monitoring sites, hourly NO and NO2 dry N deposition fluxes were simulated for the entire year 1998 to ~6 kg ha-1 yr-1. Dry deposition declined during the summer months, due to lower pollutant concentrations and temperature-induced closure of the plant stomata during afternoon hours.
Temporal Coverage: 1998-10-06
Horizontal Coordinate System:WGS_1984_UTM_Zone_12N
Rows:43
Columns:62

Column Description Type Units
Value Total NHO3 (kgN / ha / year)
Integer kilogramsPerHectarePerYear

Raster: Atmospheric Deposition Total Nitrogen from Dry Deposition in 1998

Description: The role of urban vegetation on NOx-derived dry deposition fluxes was investigated for the arid Phoenix (Arizona, USA) metropolitan area using the Community Multiscale Air Quality Model (CMAQ) (9-13 June 1998). A new land cover classification and updated land cover data were introduced in the model to account for spatial extent and heterogeneity of urban land cover. Adjustments were made in the deposition velocity calculations to consider the adaptation of local plants to the environmental conditions of Central Arizona. According to the simulations 25 percent of the NOx derived dry deposition fluxes in the urban area were deposited on vegetation. When urban vegetation was excluded from the simulations NO2 deposition was reduced by 57 percent because of the significantly lower deposition velocities of impervious compared to vegetated surfaces; nitric acid deposition was relatively unchanged. Using a diagnostic model with input data from urban air quality monitoring sites, hourly NO and NO2 dry N deposition fluxes were simulated for the entire year 1998 to ~6 kg ha-1 yr-1. Dry deposition declined during the summer months, due to lower pollutant concentrations and temperature-induced closure of the plant stomata during afternoon hours.
Temporal Coverage: 1998-10-06
Horizontal Coordinate System:WGS_1984_UTM_Zone_12N
Rows:43
Columns:62

Column Description Type Units
Value Total N flux (kgN / ha / year)
Integer kilogramsPerHectarePerYear

Download EML Metadata for this data package