Skip to Content
Report an accessibility problem

Effects of urban horticulture on insect pollinator community structure in the central Arizona-Phoenix area

Publication date: 2002

Author(s):

  • Nancy McIntyre, Texas Tech University

Abstract:

Insects that pollinate flowering plants are often considered "keystone species," animals that play extremely important roles in ecosystem functioning such that their absence would have more widespread and far-reaching effects than their abundance alone would indicate. For example, the absence of pollinating insects would translate to a severe reduction in plant reproduction, which would in turn affect not only the plants but also seed-eating animals, herbivorous animals, predators of the herbivores, and so on in a trophic cascade. Such a scenario would impact not only wildlife but also human populations because insects pollinate the majority of human food-plants. While the importance of these relationships is acknowledged, surprisingly, little is known about how insect pollinator communities are affected by environmental changes, such as global climate change or urban development. There has recently been a call for research on insect pollinator communities, citing a pressing need to obtain baseline information in the face of probable future environmental changes.

The Sonoran Desert has one of the most diverse insect communities in the world (particularly for members of the Order Hymenoptera [bees, wasps, and ants], which perform the lion's share of pollination duties for both native and crop plants). This community may be threatened from the presence of the exotic honeybee and from habitat alteration in the form of urban development. We propose to conduct a pilot study to examine how the pollinator community differs under different forms of urban land use in the Phoenix metropolitan area.

We have three research questions: (1) How does the ratio of native species to the exotic honeybee differ among natural desert, urban desert remnants, and residential areas that also have flowering plants? (2) How does insect pollinator community structure (richness and abundance) differ among natural desert, urban desert remnants, and residential areas? and (3) How does insect pollinator community structure differ with different residential horticultural practices (xeriscaping with native plants vs. watered lawns with exotic species)?


Keywords:


Temporal Coverage:

1999-04-11

Geographic Coverage:

Geographic Description: The Phoenix Metropolitan area is located at the Northern edge of the Sonoran Desert
Bounding Coordinates:
Longitude:-112.388299 to -111.494458
Latitude:33.657253 to 33.323395

Contact:

Information Manager, Global Institute of Sustainability, Arizona State University, 
POB 875402,TEMPE
 caplter.data@asu.edu

Methods used in producing this dataset: Show


Data Files (4) :

Tabular: 26_samples_1.csv

Description: insect count in traps

Column Description Type Units
sample_id arbitrary unique identifier for each sample
integer
site_id Identification assigned to individual sites
string
siteParallel Site Parallel
integer
Enumeration:
  • 1: first parallel
  • 2: second parallel
samplingDate Date of sampling
string
samplingMonth Month of sampling
integer
Enumeration:
  • 9: September
  • 4: April
samplingYear Sampling year
integer nominalYear
type Landscape type
string
Enumeration:
  • xeric yard: A landscape type with large areas of gravel
  • mesic yard: A landscape type with large areas of lawn and large trees
  • urban desert park: Nature preserve within the city boundaries
  • fringe desert park: Nature preserve at the city limits
color Trap color
string
Enumeration:
  • yellow: yellow traps
  • blue: blue traps
species_id Abbreviation of species' names
integer
number_individuals Number of individuals per species
integer number

Tabular: 26_sites_1.csv

Description: sites at which traps were placed

Column Description Type Units
site_id Site identification
string
SITENAME Site name
string
type Landscape type
string
Enumeration:
  • xeric yard: A landscape type with large areas of gravel
  • mesic yard: A landscape type with large areas of lawn and large trees
  • urban desert park: Nature preserve within the city boundaries
  • fringe desert park: Nature preserve at the city limits
typeLong NO METADATA PROVIDED
string

Tabular: 26_taxonlist_1.csv

Description: lookup table for taxon information

Column Description Type Units
species_id Internal Identification
integer
date Sampling date
string nominalYear
Family Taxonomic Family name
string
Genus Taxonomic genus name
string
species Species name
string
Overlap Listing of overlap
string
Guild Insect species guild
string
pollinator Is the species a pollinator or not
string
Enumeration:
  • y: is pollinator
ASU_ITIS_ID Internal Id code
integer

Tabular: 26_site_description_1.csv

Description: additional information about the sites

Column Description Type Units
site_id Site ID
string
DATE Date of sampling
datetime Format: MM/DD/YYYY
BARE percent Bare ground
float dimensionless
GRAVEL Percent of gravel
float dimensionless
MESIC percent Mesic landscaping
float dimensionless
OTHER percent Miscellaneous Landscapes
float dimensionless
POOL Percent area pool takes up
float dimensionless
POND Percent area pond takes up
float dimensionless
CACTUS Cactus count
float dimensionless
NTREES native trees
float dimensionless
ETREES exotic trees
float dimensionless
SHRUBS Shrub count
integer dimensionless
NSHRUBS native shrubs
integer dimensionless
ESHRUBS exotic shrubs
integer dimensionless
HERBS Herb count
integer dimensionless
FLOWERS Flower count
float dimensionless

Download EML Metadata for this data package